Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Featured picture candidates

Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates:

Media 

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things edit

Nominating edit

Guidelines for nominators edit

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents edit

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs edit

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio edit

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations edit

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).

Simple tutorial for new users edit

Tutorial: Nominate on COM:FPC
How to nominate in 8 simple steps

STEP 1

  • STEP 1
    STEP 1

STEP 2

  • STEP 2
    STEP 2

STEP 3

  • STEP 3
    STEP 3

STEP 4

  • STEP 4
    STEP 4

STEP 5

  • STEP 5
    STEP 5

STEP 6

  • STEP 6
    STEP 6

STEP 7

  • STEP 7
    STEP 7

STEP 8

  • STEP 8 (last step)
    STEP 8 (last step)

NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you.

Adding a new nomination edit

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.

Voting edit

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Featured picture delisting candidates edit

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

Featured picture candidate policy edit

General rules edit

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have less than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules edit

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. There is also a limit of two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite edit

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember... all rules can be broken.

See also edit

Table of contents edit

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates edit

File:Utah Dunes Landscape - West Desert District.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2024 at 09:02:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Marina Bay Singapore-3499.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2024 at 08:26:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Tarasp gemeente Scuol, "House to watch the sunset", 18-09-2023. (actm.) 28.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2024 at 05:50:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Kõrgessaare-sadam-2-OlariPilnik.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2024 at 18:59:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Giant clam (Tridacna gigas) Michaelmas Cay.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2024 at 12:36:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Schwarze Habichtsfliege (Dioctria atricapilla).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2024 at 10:26:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Merlión, Marina Bay, Singapur, 2023-08-18, DD 45-47 HDR.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2024 at 09:40:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:2016 AIRBUS AS350B3 N185 SD by Don Ramey Logan.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2024 at 09:29:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Rowers on a long racing pirogue training for a competition at sunrise in Don Det Laos.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2024 at 03:53:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Ilish Bhaat.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2024 at 21:24:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Steve Jobs and Macintosh computer, January 1984, by Bernard Gotfryd - edited.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2024 at 19:58:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Anyone who wish to do so, is of course welcome to make their own version of this photo. However, per lots of discussions here, this version can't be overwritten, even by me, since it is a FP on en-Wiki with extracted images etc. used in many articles. I made it years ago to the best of my ability at the time and with the tools available back then. I didn't create it to be nominated anywhere, just wanted to see how the image looked after a bit of cleanup. No one is more surprised than me at the attention it has received since then. --Cart (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Myurellopsis parkinsoni 01.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2024 at 06:54:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Luzern asv2022-10 Jesuitenkirche img2.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2024 at 08:01:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Zaadbox van een Eucomis kuiflelie. 01-10-2023. (d.j.b).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2024 at 05:44:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  •   Question Are the focus stacking errors causing irregularities in the shapes of the leaf edges, or are those shapes taken from life? Is there somewhere else in the picture where you're seeing focus stack errors? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Note: When it comes to the faint leaves in the background. These have been deliberately kept vague because I have focused on the three little seed pods.The upper leaves have been cut off to allow the seed pods to emerge as best as possible. That is a matter of taste. Thank you both for your comments.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ourapteryx clara formosana late instar larva.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 15:41:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  •   Oppose I think I agree with Charles. It's amazing how much this caterpillar looks like a twig, so it's great to show it in the context of a plant, but the arrangement of the leaves in the background, including random-looking crops, is distracting and not a great composition, I find. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pistesääsklase Culiceta annulata tiib.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 15:32:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Pupae of the parasitoid Paracodrus apterogynus.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 15:23:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Wasserkuppe (Weiherberg) 1.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 15:05:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Ópera, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 54-56 HDR.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 12:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
I am ok with your fisrt edit of the 4th February, but not the others. I find there a lot of QI pictures with edit. I know its not forbbiden, but I don't like this. Sorry. Despite my vote, tour picture will be probably a QI ;) --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
To me the best solution would be to re-upload a new one. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sebring12Hrs, there is now one own version of the file with the former crop. Poco a poco (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vincent van Gogh - The yellow house ('The street').jpg edit

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 12:57:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Laranjas-pera.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 12:42:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Ernest Shackleton before 1909.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 07:34:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Bois Raquet, in the High Fens – Eifel Nature Park (DSCF6655).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 03:02:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Rethymno old harbour lighthouse 1.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 03:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Carved wooden bench furniture and crafts at Heuan Chan heritage house in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 01:21:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Your links are not to triangle cushions. I would be surprised to find a triangle cushion anywhere near a massage table. But the real point is whether an image showing crafts from Laos should feature a modern cushion of Thai design? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Laos and Thailand were a single country until 1893. Almost the same language and the cultural similarities are numerous. These triangular cushions are very old, already represented in ancient paintings. So it's quite normal to find such traditional cushions in a Laotian house. Nike shoes are American even if they are made in China. These cushions are inherited from the kingdom of Siam (including Laos) and typical from the area. Maybe the petrol lamps are made in Vietnam or Cambodia, but they are also widespread here. So finding all these elements together is not really surprising, and is even certainly intentional -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lucas Cranach dÆ, Melankolien, 1532, KMSsp722, Statens Museum for Kunst.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 22:14:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Hosta flower-20230730-RM-112817.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 20:55:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Lion waiting in Namibia.jpg (delist) edit

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 20:12:08
 

File:015 Chimpanzee at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 15:08:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Puente Helix, museo ArtScience y hotel Marina Bay Sands, Marina Bay, Singapur, 2023-08-17, DD 67-69 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 12:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore

File:Limões-persa.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 10:14:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Endless hills of Pienza1.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2024 at 23:48:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Muhammad Ali, gtfy.00140.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2024 at 22:17:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • I repeat: there is no such rule as "We should not crop historical images." This should be evaluated on case by case basis. And as I explain below, it is a wrong argument here. But giving real valid arguments is much more difficult than false pretexts. Yann (talk) 15:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • You have your opinion, and he has his. I don't know why that's hard for you to accept, but I'm done here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • English is not my mother tongue but I learnt at school that "should" and "must" have different meanings. Nevertheless, in any case, it's just an opinion which is expressed here. And everybody are entitled to have one. I agree with Ikan, Charles and Frank. Considering we should not alter masterpieces, or delete essential elements of a photo, or change the artist's composition, is a very valid point of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • @Frank Schulenburg: Historical images are altered all the time. They are restored, and many decisions have to be taken about colors, how much restoration should be done, etc. In addition, it doesn't make sense here because this is not scanned from a print. This is a slide, which was never printed as it is. Whoever may have printed it did alter it one way or another, at least cropping the black borders. Yann (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support: clearly superior composition compared to the original. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Strong oppose This photo is the work of a famous photographer called Bernard Gotfryd. It is not Bernard Gotfryd's artwork cropped by User:Yann, it is just Bernard Gotfryd's artwork. If this photographer is famous, it's perhaps because of the competence in his sector? And there might be also a reason why the author chose to frame his subject this way? A reason why the picture has become famous this way? Empty space has immediately an impact on the viewer. It's not just a head, it's a head with the eyes looking up and a generous space above in the same direction, suggesting like an aura. Essential in the representation of Muhammad Ali. There is freedom, lead room, evoked over this head.
This iconic picture is a historical document, found in the Library and Congress. Perhaps also exposed in museums, sold in auctions, etc. An iconic photograph only contains important details, and is well-known for the special ratio immediately recognizable (3:2, 4:3, 16:9, golden ratio, or else). You don't cut Piet Mondrian abstract painting because there is too much red for your taste, and similarly you don't cut the iconic picture of a famous photographer even if you don't understand the artist's choice -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • This seems essentially a straw-man argument. Have you even look at the source? I think I have respected the photographer's intent (no crop on the left), and only cropped the distractive element. That's what is done in every cases. And again, as I said above, this is a slide, and was never printed that way. Yann (talk) 11:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • To be featured, this picture should be able to illustrate 1) Muhammad Ali and 2) Bernard Gotfryd's work. The educational value is much higher when you can show how talented photographers compose their portraits. Moreover, the impact is more fascinating with space above, than without. And the original 3:2 ratio also has more meaning than this weird and arbitrary 1.22:1 format. There are historians who can be interested in the original document, and photographers interested in studying the author's style. Other photos by the same photographer reveal similar compositions, which suggests that this style is an integral part of the personality. Composition, like light, is not a minor element in photography, it is essential -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Comment The crop seems like uneasy compromise between the tight edit like this and the original slide minus the borders. You can still see part of the human figure on the right and there is too much space above for a portrait photo. --Thi (talk) 22:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Concrete fence of Nagai Botanical Garden (B&W), January 2024 edit

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2024 at 19:09:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

Alternative edit

 

File:Cala Berretta1.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2024 at 00:18:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:US Marshals with Young Ruby Bridges on School Steps.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 21:44:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Sperlinga panorama.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 20:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

Alternative edit

 

File:Galah (Eolophus roseicapilla albiceps) male Adelaide.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 10:15:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Mamões.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 14:53:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Ravi Varma-Lady playing the swarbat.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2024 at 12:25:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:At Dunham Massey 2024 014 - Snowdrops.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2024 at 23:30:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:The Martyrdom of Saint Dorothea by Josse van der Baren St Peter collegiate church in Leuven (1).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2024 at 14:27:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Yes, but the doors are on hinges. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Intentionally displayed like that in the church I suppose -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Statues on the gable of Linderhof Palace edit

Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2024 at 13:36:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  •  
    "Agriculture" and "Trade"
  •  
    "Atlas"
  •  
    "Science" and "Industry"

Alternative: Allegoric statues on the gable of Linderhof Palace edit

  •  
    "Agriculture" and "Trade"
  •  
    "Science" and "Industry"
  • Unfortunately the new versions with architectural elements removed are fake representations of the reality. Retouching such images by removing temporary elements (like a distracting plane for example, or litter), is generally acceptable, but not permanent elements which are structural parts of the site, in my opinion. Misleading images, all the more as {{Retouched}} is missing -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alley in Colatina.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 12:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

Alternative edit

 

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 19:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Timetable (day 5 after nomination) edit 

Sat 03 Feb → Thu 08 Feb
Sun 04 Feb → Fri 09 Feb
Mon 05 Feb → Sat 10 Feb
Tue 06 Feb → Sun 11 Feb
Wed 07 Feb → Mon 12 Feb
Thu 08 Feb → Tue 13 Feb

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting) edit 

Tue 30 Jan → Thu 08 Feb
Wed 31 Jan → Fri 09 Feb
Thu 01 Feb → Sat 10 Feb
Fri 02 Feb → Sun 11 Feb
Sat 03 Feb → Mon 12 Feb
Sun 04 Feb → Tue 13 Feb
Mon 05 Feb → Wed 14 Feb
Tue 06 Feb → Thu 15 Feb
Wed 07 Feb → Fri 16 Feb
Thu 08 Feb → Sat 17 Feb

Closing a featured picture promotion request edit

The bot edit

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure edit

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
     (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    featured or not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/February 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request edit

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/February 2024.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination edit

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/February 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=804402179"