User talk:4ing

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 4ing!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, 4ing!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Alte.Brown.JC.jpg is uncategorized since 16 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Getz Ice Shelf.jpg was uncategorized on 21 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Statue ved Ulsrud Vgs.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi, thank for you for notifying me about the image. I have one question, however. The law text states that this [the depiction of permanently mounted works of art and photographic works when located in or near a public space] does not apply when the work is clearly the main motive and the reproduction is exploited commercially (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Norway). I realise that the statue is clearly the main motive of the image, but I cannot see how the image is being "exploited commercially". Is it only necessary for one of the conditions to be met in order to mark the image as a copyright violation? Michae2109 (talk) 19:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When considering the principle that Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose I do understand why the image was deleted. I apologise for my rather rash query, just ignore my previous message:)Michae2109 (talk) 19:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sea Shepherd images edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I tagged a whole pile of sea shepherd images for deletion as the flickr user who uploaded them has stated that he has only uploaded them to support sea shepherd and in fact does not have any rights to them. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a note on my talkpage on en.wikipedia. --Terrillja (talk) 16:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nisshin_Maru_vs_Sea_Shepherd.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Nisshin_Maru_vs_Sea_Shepherd.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Terrillja (talk) 15:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nisshin_Maru_and_Sea_Sheperd_activist.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Nisshin_Maru_and_Sea_Sheperd_activist.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Terrillja (talk) 15:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Hans_Christian_Albert_Hansen.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hans_Christian_Albert_Hansen.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 21:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Antarctic_iceberg,_2001_-2.jpg and File:Nature_Antarctica_20.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, regarding these images, I am not so sure that the 800x600 is an "upscaled" version with data loss. I think the flickr author (or perhaps the flickr software?) has done some arbitrary downscaling and saved of his/her original photograph to different sizes. Note that even the 500pixel version (on flickr) has a larger file size (90kb) than the 640pixel version (80kb). Editing software can easily produce a larger file size when down scaling an image (difference compression parameters for instance). Aesthetically I can not see any lower quality in the 800px version. The 800px version was uploaded by the flickr reviewer, so it is reasonable to assume it was from the flickr site, but no longer offered there now. --Tony Wills (talk) 00:41, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Woods bay 0778.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! Which tool do you use to transfer to Commons? There seems to be a problem - notice the #'s instead of ['s and ]'s etc. --MGA73 (talk) 19:54, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I cleaned up here so it should be ok now. --MGA73 (talk) 19:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I used Magnus' CommonsHelper. Thank's for cleaning up. - 4ing (talk) 20:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:50193 Rut Tellefsen.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:50193 Rut Tellefsen.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 13:32, 26 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Cross at Cape Evans, Ross Island.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrew Gray (talk) 20:49, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Soemba edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Reverted your recategorising. See nl:Wilton-Fijenoord werd opgericht op 1 januari 1929. Het was een fusie tussen de NV Maatschappij voor Scheeps- en Werktuigbouw Fijenoord, gevestigd te Rotterdam en de NV Wilton's Dok- en Werf Maatschappij met vestigingen te Rotterdam en Schiedam. --Stunteltje (talk) 21:24, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry for that... A descriptive text in the category pages would be beneficial, to avoid confusion. - 4ing (talk) 22:04, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem. I am from Rotterdam, know these things and did some research on the date of completion. --Stunteltje (talk) 22:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Willem Barendsz II (ship, 1954).jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Willem Barendsz II (ship, 1954).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

206.126.18.192 09:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Norge Horten. Fergen Horten - Moss.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Norge Horten. Fergen Horten - Moss.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:31, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image Gaute Ormåsen edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello 4ing, thank you so much for upload other images to the Commons. Searching on Flickr found the user and posted the photo, imagining that someone would see and would post other photos i preferred to leave to there, since i don't have a really good internet. Pablodiego15 (talk) 22:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ytre Hvaler, Torbjørnskjær lighthouse edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi The file File:Ytre Hvaler, Torbjørnskjær lighthouse.jpg and all the others in this category have been given to me by Fylkesmannen i Østfold with permission to use them on wikimedia under this licensing. Silverkey (talk) 08:06, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Excellent! In order to avoid deletion of the images, you should send documentation of this permission to Commons:OTRS. - 4ing (talk) 08:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hack Murphy image edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Can i use the image from: http://www.flickr.com/photos/95659330@N06/8726878408/in/photostream? --Deyoungisthan (talk) 22:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The photo has a Commons-compatible licence on Flickr, but it is highly questionable whether the uploader has the copyrights to the photo. The photo seems to be copied from IMDb. - – 4ing (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jacob Lerche.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jacob Lerche.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

file problem with your recent upload edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

hi;

you requested a rename of File:Bærums VerkSandvika Two-Wheeled Road Trip No. 15 Iceberg. Bærum Kulturhus Asymmetrical architecture in Norway is not uncommon. They have deviated landscapes making it reasonable enough to design buildings that complement the deviation. Icebergs are.jpg to File:Bærum kulturhus.jpg

i attempted to do the rename, but the file itself does not seem to exist, even though the file-info is present.

could you please re-upload the image, to the new file name?

Lx 121 (talk) 22:20, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Flickr upload bot appearently failed, so I have re-uploaded the image. Thanks for your help. - 4ing (talk) 21:59, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Manny de Guerre and Elya Chavez.jpg, File:Elya Chavez, NY.jpg, edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello! I think, that these photos have been deleted by mistake. On official website, where the photos is posted, written, that they are distributed under license CC-BY SA 3.0. 1, 2. P.S. sorry for my English. Ugonschik (talk) 00:34, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry for that. The files were restored by an administrator yesterday, with links to the pages showing the license. - 4ing (talk) 21:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:EZ-LTG (aircraft) edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:EZ-LTG (aircraft) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dura-Ace (talk) 19:53, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Statfjord B (NOMF 02774 565).jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Statfjord B (NOMF 02774 565).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Statfjord B (NOMF 02774 565).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 15:15, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you please provide a source with this image? --High Contrast (talk) 15:16, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The thumbnail preview function is apparently not working, so you have to click the image in the left margin. The image will then appear in a new window, with the license tag included. - 4ing (talk) 17:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are right. Sorry for that. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 22:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Correction Dutch Pronunciation edit

Removing template Uncategorized[bewerken]

Would it be ok for you if I ask someone to remove the template --Uncategorised-- from files in Category:Dutch pronunciation (caused by the error in VicuñaUploader 1.19 in mid November)? 4ing (talk) 14:51, 7 January 2014 (UTC) That would be very helpfull Thanks Marcel coenders (talk)

A barnstar for you! edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

	The Surreal Barnstar
	thank you مؤمل الجبوري (talk) 14:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bruk av grafer og tabeller fra SSB edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hei! Anne-Sophie Ofrim sier at du er x-pert på opphavsrettigheter. Jeg har en en mengde grafiske fremstillinger fra Statistisk sentralbyrå (ssb) som jeg vil bruke til å illustrere en stor artikkel om energi i Norge med. På nettsiden til ssb står det at grafer og tabeller kan benyttes, bare en opplyser om at ssb er kilden. Er det en egen attribut som velges for å få dette til å gå gjennom ved opplastingen? --Frankemann (talk) 19:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeg har gitt et delvis svar på diskujonssiden til Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk · contribs). En mulighet er å kontakte SSB og høre om de kan legge inn et lisensmerke på sine nettsider, som klart viser at materialet er lisensiert med en for Commons akseptabel lisens (f.eks. {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}). - mvh 4ing (talk) 21:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Ships by IMO number edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago9 comments2 people in discussion

Please realize that categorizing a ship in Category:IMO 9148506 by Category:Ships by IMO number without the piping |9148506 all are categorized by sequence IMO, not by the number 9148506. So please be so kind to revert. --Stunteltje (talk) 13:21, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, correct sorting is embedded in the template {{IMO}}. - 4ing (talk) 13:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think that there is a misunderstanding. For the Look up template you are correct. For the IMO category we have more than 11.000 ships categorized with the number behind the | --Stunteltje (talk) 13:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The look up template is defining the default sort key for the category, and are applied in all the parent directories unless overridden by a custom sort key. This default sort key is the IMO number (numeric value, without the letters IMO). All of the entries in Category:Ships by IMO number are sorted correctly, including the few hundred categories I have created without adding a specific sort key (e.g. Category:IMO 9181510, see also Category:IMO 1004819 on the first page in Category:Ships by IMO number). It is therefore not necessary to include the sort key as long as you include Template:IMO (not to be confused with Template:IMOcat). - 4ing (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for this explanation. I started a long time ago with categorising ships and all the way things are improved. This template was not in my system and I forgot to add this one to add in new categories. Perhaps it is useful to add the template to the old categories by bot and skip the piping in the categories there. --Stunteltje (talk) 14:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes. I think that is a well suited task for a bot. I found 125 categories sorted under "I" ([1]), in addition there are probably houndreds of categories sorted under "I" in the [[Category:Ships built at NN yard]]. These errors would be fixed by inserting Template:IMO. BTW, are you aware of Category:IMO checksum failed? It contains IMO categories with invalid IMO numbers, and I think we should try to keep it empty. I have spent some time correcting these errors, but there are still quite a few left. - 4ing (talk) 07:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have seen that category. I know the problem, but also know where it comes from. For administrative reasons the Miramar-site gave these dummy-IMO numbers to old ships. For us it is as helpful as for Miramar for the same reason as for other ships by IMO number: it groups images for the same ships but with different names. Therefore I saw no reason to skip these categories myself. --Stunteltje (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I strongly discourage using invalid IMO numbers just to group related categories. According to the description in Category:Ships by name, the category with the old name should be a subcategory of the one with the new name if no IMO/ENI number exists for the ship. - 4ing (talk) 11:29, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are right. I don't add these numbers any more and I hope to recognise a wrong number in time. --Stunteltje (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

David Villa Euro2008.jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi 4ing, I noticed that you were attempting to place deletion tag for David Villa Euro2008.jpg, This image is not an Getty Image it was uploaded by the user from Flickr who owns this image, Therefore this is likely to be Public Domain Image with expired license which was rightfully claimed by the Flickr Uploader. I would kindly advise you to stay away from putting speedy deletion tags on my pictures without giving a qualified reason. Thank You --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 21:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The photo is tagged with (c) All rights reserved on Flickr, not with a free license as required by Commons. Moreover, the uploader is very unlikely to be the copyright holder, as the caption states that Photo credit should read JAVIER SORIANO/AFP/Getty Images. - 4ing (talk) 06:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:BB Troll (ship, 2000) edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Sorry about that. So the "BB" isn't a prefix like HMS or SS? Would the same be true for the other ship categories starting with BB that I also changed?

Thanks for educating me! --Auntof6 (talk) 16:52, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

BB is an abbreviation for the shipowner, Bukser & Berging, and part of the name, not a ship type prefix. I think all ships listed above should be sorted under B. - 4ing (talk) 20:59, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, thanks very much for clarifying. I will change them all to sort under B. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Photograhps_by_Fjellanger_Widerøe edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Photograhps_by_Fjellanger_Widerøe has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Humatiel (talk) 19:04, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Larvik, Norsk Impregnering (14577188742).jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Larvik, Norsk Impregnering (14577188742).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 07:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Frogner Park, Oslo (14671954747).jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Frogner Park, Oslo (14671954747).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 01:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Frogner Park, Oslo (14858476955).jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Frogner Park, Oslo (14858476955).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 03:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

IMO number edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

You were correct with the wrong IMO number of the ENTERPRISE. It is in fact 8434037. --Stunteltje (talk) 10:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, I was not able to find an IMO number for her, only the MMSI number (246154000) - 4ing (talk) 10:32, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In many cases (even old ships) you can find years of completion and IMO numbers at http://www.shipspotting.com. --Stunteltje (talk) 10:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I use it a lot, but was not able to find the IMO number on first attempt and was not sure pilot vessels required an IMO number. - 4ing (talk) 10:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Coral Energy LNG tanker.jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coral Energy LNG tanker.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Coral Energy LNG tanker.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your images from bergstaden.org edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Please note that the license there is {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}, not {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aalumgården, Bergmannsgata 20, Røros (572).jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aalumgården, Bergmannsgata 20, Røros (572).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 17:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Armand Coustenoble.jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

the licence is not a fake is the same licence of for autorisation it's the same of the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pierre-Charles_Hordelalay.jpg

more sylvain the author of the photo has already sent a permission OSTR --Iffrit51 (d) 08:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

you can verify the permission of file with

This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page.

The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2014042810007131.

If you have questions about the archived correspondence, please use the VRT noticeboard. Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2014042810007131
Find other files from the same ticket:

it's the file is not include in permission i send message to sylvain to forward permission --Iffrit51 (talk) 08:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A cup of coffee for you! edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Tak for dine kategoriseringer! Her er en kop kaffe.

Jeg arbejder på den danske artikel om Edvard Munchs "Skrik" ("Skriget" på dansk) https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skriget

Men mangler i den forbindelse et billede af versionen fra 1893 som findes på Munch-museet. Mon du kan hjælpe med det og evt. efterlyse det. Et meget lille billede af det findes her: http://www.dagbladet.no/2012/04/30/kultur/kunst/auksjon/edvard_munch/sothebys/21375239/ , men et i bedre kvalitet ville være ønskeligt.

med venlig hilsen

Villy Fink Isaksen, Aarhus, Danmark Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mange takk for deilig kaffe. Jeg skal se hva jeg kan finne, men i mellomtiden kan jo bildet fra Dagbladet lastes opp. - 4ing (talk) 13:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Så er det uploadet https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Skrik_1893.jpg , men et bedre kunne være ønskeligt, mon ikke en aller anden kunne besøge museet og tage et foto af det "Skrik"? --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeg fant et bilde i noe bedre oppløsning og bedre farger, men tilbakestill meg gjerne dersom du synes første bildet var bedre. Jeg leter uansett videre :-) - 4ing (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeg har lige fundet Munchs første udgave af "Skriget" kaldet for "Fortvivlelse" File:Fortvivlan.jpg . --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Takk edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Kaffekopp herfra også. ;-) Logget på nå for å se nærmere på de tre bildene av Nini Roll Anker som har blitt foreslått slettet, og så ser jeg at du har vært der allerede. Tusen takk! Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 08:52, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Diskusjon på opphavsrettigheter mellom fotograf og billedsamling edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Hei Anne-Sophie! Du har hjulpet meg før, og nå er det uenighet om bildet Sørgående dagtog 452 i Lønsdalen.jpg som er hentet fra digitalmuseum (søk på "Sørgående dagtog på Nordlandsbanen") og lastet opp på Wikicommons. Jeg har spurt Akershusmuseet og fått følgende e-post fra dem:

Dear Wikicommons

I hereby confirm that I am the exclusive copyright holder and has all the rights to the image [Sørgående dagtog på Nordlandsbanen]. I hereby licenses it under the license "Creative Commons Attribution 3.0" for use in Wikicommons. The images must be credited [Erik Borgersen/Akershusmuset].

Best regards

Mvh.

Øivind Möller Bakken

Head of Photography, Akershusmuseet

Som jeg har videresent til permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Der er det en som heter Aaron Green som mener at bildet ikke kan godkjennes brukt i Wikicommons så lenge Erik Borgersen, som står som fotograf, ikke gir sin utrykkelige tillatelse. Dette mener jeg blir å gå for langt. For det første er DigitalMuseum en profesjonell nasjonal billdedatabase. For det andre må vi da kunne stole på at Øivind Möller Bakken, som er fotoansvarlig hos Akershusmuseet, har greie på hva han gir oss lov til. For det tredje er bildet tatt for snart 30 år siden, og hvordan skal vi da kunne forlange av Akershusmuseet at de skal spore opp mannen og spørre om hans tillatelse? De som tar bilder som de vil ha rettighetene til er da mye mer påpasselige med hvem de gir bildene sine til enn som så? --Frankemann (talk) 18:39, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kan den Erik Borgersen være den Erik Borgersen som er Senior Adviser Operational Safety, National Railway Administration? Haros (talk) 20:08, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeg er enig i at dette kravet er for strengt. En løsning kan være en forespørsel om å merke bildene med en akseptabel CC lisens på DigitaltMuseum. Pass da bare på å merke opplastningene med {{License review}}, slik at noen sjekker at lisensen stemmer (viktig dersom bildet eller lisensmerket senere skulle forsvinne fra DigitaltMuseum). - 4ing (talk) 21:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ja, mulig denne Erik Borgersen er ansatt hos Jernbaneverket (National Railway Administration), men dette var ment som en prinsippiel sak. Det er svært mange bilder på DigitalMuseum som eies av et eller annet museum, men der bildet står oppført med navn på fotograf. Fotograf har sikkert ofte ikke noe med musseet å gjøre. Jeg er enig med deg (4ing) om at det enkleste for å få rask ekspedering i Wikimedia sannsynligvis er å spørre musseet om å endre lisensen på Flickr eller DigitalMuseum. Jeg har nå i det siste spurt flere musseer og kommuner nordpå om bilder, de sender meg gjerne drøsevis av bilder bare de slipper å legge dem ut på DigitaltMuseum eller annet nettsted. På disse bildene står det oppført navn på fotograf. Jeg er redd at spørsmålet igjen dukker opp fra OTRS. Kanskje løsningen er å få fotoansvarlig på museumene til å bekrefte at fotografen ikke har noen rettighet til bildene? --Frankemann (talk) 17:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeg vet ikke om det finnes noen ankemulighet for avgjørelser tatt av OTRS, i så fall ville det vært en mulighet. Eventuelt kan du ta opp temaet på Commons:Village pump. For øvrig vil jeg fraråde deg fra å flytte diskusjonstråder mellom brukerdiskusjoner. Dersom du ønsker å nå en bestemt bruker, kan du "pinge" vedkommende ved å lenke brukernavnet til vedkommende, f.eks. slik: Frankemann. - 4ing (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bildnis Viola (1947).jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hi 4ing, I uploaded a couple of art pictures from my father where I am the sole copyright holder of and wrote an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Sorry, I am new to this so I do not know if I have to start any other process or just wait until they are discussed. Thanks for a quick reply, best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teddy1974 (talk • contribs)

Hi @Teddy1974, and thanks for the files. You should tag them with {{OTRS pending}}, then they won't be deleted before your email has been processed. - Best regards, 4ing (talk) 08:14, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi 4ing, thanks for your help. I added the tag on each of the pictures. Do you know how long it normally takes until an email is processed? Are we talking about days, weeks, months? Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teddy1974 (talk • contribs)

@Teddy1974: I don't know - but I would guess that there is a backlog of a few weeks. - 4ing (talk) 14:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:OTRS actually says that the current backlog is approximately 40 days. - 4ing (talk) 14:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Script edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey there 4ing! I just developed a small simple script for filemovers and thought that you might use it. Paste importScript('User:Ethically Yours/fileMove.js'); in your skin page (say, vector.js) and reload your browser. You get a small link displaying "File Rename" in your toolbox to Media requiring renaming page. If the feedback is nice I'll add to it to display the number of files in backlog in a small box, but this is just a beta sort of, and anyways there's nothing much special, just that it's quite helpful. Thought you may be interested. Thanks! Ethically Yours (talk) 12:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi.

Please use your own judgement. We're all grown ups.

Kind regards. --Wouter Drucker (talk) 11:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Wouter Drucker: Please read Commons:Licensing. - 4ing (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files:Tarrawhite6.jpg.. edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Uploaded Images

File:Tarrawhite6.jpg

File:Tarra White4.jpg

Corresponded with another Samples in Gallery

I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

and

Alettaocean6.jpg

Corresponded with another Samples in

Gallery

and about

Rocko’s Quest.jpg

by

cover art

i think dont have a problem

Iam begining work in wekipedia and I have some problem and mistakes please Restore them. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whiteyami (talk • contribs)

@Whiteyami: Please see User_talk:Achim55#Files:Tarrawhite6.jpg.../Commons:Licensing. In short, you can only upload photographs you have taken yourself or photographs that have been freely licensed by the copyright holder. - 4ing (talk) 21:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Widerøebilder fra Vestfoldmuseenes Flickr konto edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hei, Takk for at du lastet opp skråfoto fra Vestfold fra Vestfoldmuseenes Flickr-konto til Commons. Vi er glade for at bildene kommer i sirkulasjon og kan bli brukt. Jeg ville bare informere om at Widerøe-flyfoto på Flickr nå har fått endret opphavsrettslig status fra CC-BY-SA til "No known copyright restrictions". Mange har også fått korrigert informasjon. Det var feil og/eller mangler i dokumentasjonen på noen av dem; for det meste bestod dette av manglende eller feil stedsnavn. Informerer om dette i tilfelle det finnes noen automatisk måte å hente opp metadata på nytt fra Flickr.--Krihal (talk) 12:24, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Polar Pioneer and Blue Marlin (17177138092).jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

File:Polar Pioneer and Blue Marlin (17177138092).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Dennis Bratland: What was the issue with this image? It is one in a series (see e.g. File:Polar_Pioneer_and_Blue_Marlin_(16558420663).jpg, or the complete series on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/backbone_campaign/sets/72157651608306218). - 4ing (talk) 20:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I almost uploaded a bunch of their photos for the article I'm writing on the w:Seattle Arctic drilling protests, but then I noticed most of their photos are from other sources, often with somebody else's copyright notice right there in a watermark or in the EXIF. Examples: https://www.flickr.com/photos/backbone_campaign/17977299172/in/dateposted/, https://www.flickr.com/photos/backbone_campaign/17980429725/in/dateposted/, https://www.flickr.com/photos/backbone_campaign/17359878073/in/photostream/. Some of Backbone Campaign's photos might belong to the uploader, but we have no way to know, and they're clearly guilty of putting false copyrights on photos they don't own, so we can't trust anything they upload. I wish we could because I need these photos. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, thanks for the clarification. - 4ing (talk) 20:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Admin edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi 4ing,

I saw that you are an adim at no-wiki. Ever thought about becoming admin at Commons as well? If you want I can nominate you. The tools are really handy for every day maintenance :). Natuur12 (talk) 21:35, 14 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Natuur12: Thanks for having your trust, but I'm quite satisfied with my current user rights. - Kind regards, 4ing (talk) 08:19, 15 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Files_from_the_Government_of_the_City_of_Buenos_Aires_needing_categories edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Files_from_the_Government_of_the_City_of_Buenos_Aires_needing_categories has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Reguyla (talk) 23:50, 27 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you! edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

	The Minor barnstar
	Thank You Schorle (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Can you respond at File talk:Commemorative 10 Philippine Peso Coin - Remembering the People Power Revolution (Reverse).jpg and File talk:Commemorative 10 Philippine Peso Coin - Remembering the People Power Revolution (Obverse).jpg? You are a filemover, and I know you can do those requests there. I need someone to swap their names. More information can be found there. Thanks! --Pokéfan95 (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Pokéfan95: I think it requires an administrator to swap filenames, since it involves a deletion step. - 4ing (talk) 09:57, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, thanks! Alvesgaspar has started moving the file talks File talk:Commemorative 10 Philippine Peso Coin - Remembering the People Power Revolution (Reverse).jpg to Commons talk:File:Commemorative 10 Philippine Peso Coin - Remembering the People Power Revolution (Obverse).jpg. But he doesn't start yet to move the files. So I will contact an administrator for this Thanks! Pokéfan95 (talk) 23:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done by A.Savin Pokéfan95 (talk) 00:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Scotland is not in Antarctica :-) edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

I notice you added File:Nacreous clouds circa 1995 Dundee Scotland 02.jpg and File:Nacreous clouds circa 1995 Dundee Scotland 01.jpg to your page User:4ing/Antarctica... thanks, but they were taken in Scotland (nowhere near Antarctica despite what some people say about the weather ;-) ), so they really don't belong there!

All the best,

Laerol (talk)

@Laerol: A bot has added the images to my user page, based on the categorization of the images. Category:Polar stratospheric clouds is a sub-category to Category:Polar meteorology, in turn a sub-category to Category:Antarctica. Normally I remove non Antarctica-related images only if it is a large batch upload. - 4ing (talk) 22:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No big problem, I was just letting you know!

FWIW, I think this is a problem with subcategories in general- that the subject matter isn't always a strict subset of that of the parent/grandparent/etc. categories (e.g. the fact that "polar stratospheric clouds" aren't all Antarctica-based means they're not a strict subset of the grandparent "Antarctica" category's subject matter).

Then again, I also figured out if we were to strictly enforce this, we'd have massive category proliferation, with many contrived-sounding over-split categories containing very few entries and the whole thing being less than helpful except to enforce that condition. So there's no obvious solution. Laerol (talk) 14:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

LICENCIA File:KSnH - Ariadust Horizon.png edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Good Afternoon

First, I can not speak good english but I hope that you understand me.

I found a source that has IMAGE WITHOUT LICENSE. Please verify and help me if it is good, for give me more time to rescue mi other images with the same problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danyel3096 (talk • contribs)

Images needs an acceptable license, see Commons:Licensing. The license has to be published by the copyright holder. - 4ing (talk) 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

REVIEW LICENCIA File:KSnH - Ariadust Horizon.png edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Good Evening

I found other source that has IMAGE WITHOUT LICENSE or i think it. Please verify and help me if it is good again, when is Non-responsability what licence is for it.

If this is wrong source again, i will try to another.

Another This is a good souce?

Second optional source

Third optional source

A question webpages with wikipedia interface (http://zh.moegirl.org/zh-tw/%E8%B5%AB%E8%8E%B1%E6%A3%AE%C2%B7%E9%98%BF%E5%88%A9%E4%BA%9A%E8%BE%BE%E6%96%AF%E7%89%B9) are not valid right??

Danyel3096 (talk) 02:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

LICENCIA File:TERMINATED (Chihara Minori).jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Good Evening

It is a valid source? (http://www.nyaa.eu/?page=view&tid=253586&showfiles=1). See here (https://www.nyaa.eu/?page=manual).

Second option source.

Danyel3096 (talk) 03:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:File:Wasmaa Alaga 21.JPG edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear 4ing, Regarding of Warning deletion for photos of oil paintings for Iraqi artist Wasma Alaga, All are downloaded from site "Pinterest" and as you know this site Shows Photos of paintings for famous artists.

Adding that the Photos are spread in hundreds of sites, and there are interviews with the artist, including the show of Photos, you can see it at the link:

http://www.baytalmosul.com/15751604157115931604157516051610-157516041601160615751606-1589157615811610-1589157615851610---2/21

Please do not delete the photos, especially, it is used in the article about the artist Wasma Alaga --Just For Syria (talk) 09:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Free Syrian 200: It seems to me that you haven't understood the licensing policy of Wikipedia Commons. Images or artwork need to be issued under a Creative Commons license allowing free reuse (incl. modifications and commercial use) by the copyright holder (photograph/artist) in order to be hosted on Commons and used in Wikipedia articles. A permission has to be sent in accordance with Commons:OTRS unless the photo is clearly marked with a compatible license on an official webpage or similar. - 4ing (talk) 20:24, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ikke fredet bygninger edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Vennligst se på tinget, takk --Sjokolade (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Regarding uploading pic edit

i have uploaded two pic https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jjs_show.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:EMRALD_GEMFIELDS_OPTION_copy.jpg i am the owner of the pics mailed permission word file to OTRS hope it will help now --Hemalove (talk) 03:28, 19 February 2016

Dream card, Las tres gracias_Claudia Coca and La Otra edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear 4ing. Regardinf the files: Dream card, Las tres gracias_Claudia Coca and La Otra, I have send the proper docomentation. This is my ticket number: [Ticket#2016020910017487]. Thanks! Yhhue91 (talk) 08:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yhhue91: I've replaced the missing permission-tags with {{OTRS pending}}. I reccommend you include this template (write {{subst:OP}}) in later uploads to avoid tagging of missing permission. 4ing (talk) 21:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear 4ing. Many thanks. I will follow your advice. Cheers!-Yhhue91 (talk) 02:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:SSAntarctic.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:SSAntarctic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jolly Janner (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RAVN edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is RAVN not a jackup rig?--Stunteltje (talk) 17:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, it's a steel jacket platform. - 4ing (talk) 18:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 1000 files per page. After the new edit, the page would have reached approximately 1473 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad or because the galleries need to encompass a shorter timeframe. Please review your settings and request an appropriate change to your gallery. The logs are available here.

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your the bot owner will remove the gallery altogether.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre, via OgreBot (talk) 03:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 1000 files per page. After the new edit, the page would have reached approximately 1471 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad or because the galleries need to encompass a shorter timeframe. Please review your settings and request an appropriate change to your gallery. The logs are available here.

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your the bot owner will remove the gallery altogether.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre, via OgreBot (talk) 03:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Subjects of photo edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Do you have any comment regarding File talk:609 Alf og Frank Hansen.jpg? --David Biddulph (talk) 13:20, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Changing licences edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some of your recent uploads do not have the correct licence under which they were found. For example File:Eldfisk oljeplatform (DEX KF 000624).jpg and File:Ekofisk 2-4 B oljeplatform (DEX KF 000632).jpg are licensed as cc-by-4.0 but you changed it to cc-by-sa-4.0. Please be more careful in future. Thanks for uploading. Ww2censor (talk) 16:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Alar (NSM.2100-302).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gestumblindi (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SKANDI ACU edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, 4ing, vessel name is SKANDI ACU SKANDI ACU, I don't understand why do you write non-English letters. This ship is registered by DNV-GL, EU-Register. If the vessel Korea or Russia registered, we use English transliteration of ship name for this case not "Category:Адмирал Григорович (ship, 2016)", this is bad cat name, regards --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 17:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@PjotrMahh1: The category name follows the official policy described on Commons:Categories: Particular individual object (a specific person, building, monument, artwork, organization, event etc.) uses a singular form usually (but not always). Proper nouns which do not have an established English variant are not translated ad hoc but use the original form – Latin alphabets are used in original form including diacritics and derived letters, non-Latin alphabets are transcribed to the English Latin script. In this specific case, the ship name includes a diacritic letter, but it is written in the Latin alphabet. Please let me know if this is unclear to you. - 4ing (talk) 07:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

- 4ing, do you understand that the name of ship (official proper noun) is Skandi Acu not Skandi Açu as you wish. Why do you not write Skandi Afu or Skandi Abu? We always and only take the ship name from register not from the heavens,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 07:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC) P. S. This ship is neither by Norwegian nor Portuguese (Porto do Açu) register with ç-letters. If you meen Tromsø as city, is is o.k. If the Tromsø named ship is by Norwegian register is o.k. too, but Tromso if so named by international register. It is very bad that shipbuilders had painted Skandi Açu on the bow of this ship, det is wrong,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 07:57, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@PjotrMahh1: I disagree with you. The shipowner is naming the ship, and to my knowledge there are no rules that prohibit using diacritics in the name. - 4ing (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If I want to name my ship SKANDI МОСКВА (SKANDI MOSKVA) I will register my ship in Russia, and if SKANDI Θεοδώρα, so in Greece. I cannot register the ship named Αγία Θεοδώρα or МОСКВА in Norway. No chance. I meen I as a ship owner. I must use English and ABC-letters of this country, for example + Õ, Ä, Ö, Ü in Estonia. And I don't see the letter "Ç" in the name on this page SKANDI ACU, best regards,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 21:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think you are mixing diacritics with alphabets. We are not talking about Cyrillic or Greek alphabets, but Latin alphabet. - 4ing (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:A1452 Spiekeroog (tugboat, 1968) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Please see:

[2] and
[3] and
[4] and
[5]

All wrong? --Stunteltje (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Stunteltje: Yes, they are. The checksum fails for this number, meaning that it is not a valid IMO number. None of the sources you are listing are authoritative sources, and the error may come from a single source. Naval vessels do not have IMO number (there might be some exeptions). - 4ing (talk) 14:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I knew the fact that most naval vessels don't have IMO numbers. But sone have, most auxilliairy vessels and this is a tugboat. Assume you are right with the single source. Miramar uses numbers starting with a 5, for instance. O.K., convinced.--Stunteltje (talk) 15:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:38324 Walter Scott Dahl.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:38324 Walter Scott Dahl.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MCMLXXXIX 20:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:71775 Egil Hjorth-Jensen.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:71775 Egil Hjorth-Jensen.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MCMLXXXIX 17:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:72004 Einar Sissener.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:72004 Einar Sissener.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MCMLXXXIX 17:20, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:73259 Marit Halset.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:73259 Marit Halset.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MCMLXXXIX 17:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Anton Rønneberg.JPG edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Anton Rønneberg.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Anton Rønneberg.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

lNeverCry 20:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Thore Heramb OB.Ø49 0872.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Thore Heramb OB.Ø49 0872.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

lNeverCry 05:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Trygve Nilsen OB.Ø49 0109.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Trygve Nilsen OB.Ø49 0109.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

lNeverCry 05:32, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Trygve Nilsen OB.Ø49 0109 cropped.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Trygve Nilsen OB.Ø49 0109 cropped.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

lNeverCry 05:32, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Old photos and paintings edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I've been happy to be able to look through these great images, but a couple of copyright issues are pretty widespread. The first is no problem, and that's simply applying PD licenses to PD paintings and photos. The significant problem I see is that many of these indicate that the author is unknown, but they use a cc-by or by-sa license. If the author is unknown, than attribution is impossible. Another license has to be found for these. The best the museum could do is PD-Mark, which is unacceptable here. Is there a Norwegian license for images with unknown authors that are not otherwise PD? I'm not at all familiar with Norwegian licenses. We may have to go back thru these and tag the unknown author photos for deletion. I'll skip them for now. lNeverCry 21:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@INeverCry: I think we can use {{PD-Norway50}} on photographs as new as 1970 if the photographer is unknown. Then the question is whether it is sufficient that the source (mostly museums) has registered the photographer as unknown. - 4ing (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I just resigned my reviewer right, due mostly to questions like the one in your second sentence. With a lot of these licensing questions, you've got to wonder if some nice day your work's gonna go up in smoke with a bunch of deletion requests because the license isn't just so. Since this involves several hundred files, I would suggest you ask about this at COM:VP/C. I wouldn't want to see you waste any hard work on guessing. lNeverCry 23:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nydalen kapell edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Ser du har gått i fella, slik jeg var nær ved å gjøre en gang. Bildet som gir seg ut for å vise Nydalen kapell, er altså gravkapellet på Grefsen kirkegård. Filen har feil navn i Digitalt museum, men det er blitt oppdaget, og billedteksten i DM er nå riktig. Vi bør nok gjøre et par endringer på Commons. Ellers kjenner jeg faktisk ikke til noe bilde av Nydalen kapell, men det kan jo finnes der ute et sted. -- Vinguru (talk) 08:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ved nærmere ettertanke finnes det faktisk et bilde hos det lokale historielaget. Kanskje noen burde spørre dem om tillatelse til å bruke det? -- Vinguru (talk) 08:52, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Takk for at du følger med! Jeg har nå navnet om de to aktuelle filene. Det ser for øvrig ikke ut til at Grefsen kapell er registrert i Kulturminnesøk. Det er vel neppe historielaget som sitter på opphavsretten til bildet, men hvis vi kan finne ut når det er tatt, kan det nok være at det kan legges ut med {{PD-Norway50}}. - 4ing (talk) 08:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kan sikkert google litt eller lete i bøker på Bokhylla, men det er kanskje enklere å spørre dem?

Ellers kan faktisk Nydalen kapell skimtes i buskaset til venstre på dette bildet, men det blir nok litt sært å bruke det. -- Vinguru (talk) 09:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kom til å tenke på denne igjen og sendte dem en e-post med forespørsel om bruk. De svarte raskt og sa at det er OK så lenge det krediteres. Er dette en slik sak hvor man må oppbevare e-postkorrespondansen, og må det registreres som OTRS? Må det i så fall gå via bestemte personer, og er du en slik person? Vinguru (talk) 09:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Vinguru: Dette bør registreres i OTRS, ellers risikerer du at fila vil bli slettet. Dersom tillatelsen er skrevet på norsk, kan du sende den til info-no@wikimedia.org. Vær oppmerksom på at det ikke er sikkert det er tilstrekkelig med en generell tillatelse - det må vanligvis også spesifiseres under hvilken lisens den kan benyttes. Du kan lese mer om dette på Commons:OTRS. Foreslår at du lster opp bildet, merker det med {{OTRS pending}}, og oversender tillatelsen til info-no@wikimedia.org/OTRS for vurdering. Jeg er for øvrig ikke involvert som OTRS-frivillig. - 4ing (talk) 11:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Grefsen kapell A-10002-Ua-0021-006 (cropped).jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Grefsen kapell A-10002-Ua-0021-006 (cropped).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 18:43, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Grefsen kapell A-10002-Ua-0021-006.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Grefsen kapell A-10002-Ua-0021-006.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 18:43, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When I reviewed these earlier, the source link did not lead anywhere so was effectively no source at all and therefore it was impossible to verify the copyright status. The source now appears to work, so I am giving them a good review. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 22:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I had used a wrong code in the source template - thank's for reviewing these files. - 4ing (talk) 22:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Urskog-Hølandsbanen (UHB) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Jeg går og sikler på noen gamle bilder, men lurer på hvilke begrensninger som gjelder. Det dreier seg om bilder av stasjoner på Urkog-Hølandsbanen (Tertitten) samt av (de fleste) stasjonenes arkitekt, byggmester Günther Schüssler. Disse forekommer i en bok om banen fra 1996 som er å finne på Bokhylla, men selve bildene er eldre. Det gjelder særlig følgende (årstall som oppgitt i boken):

Hva tror du om disse? Er de tagbare? — Vinguru (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ja, disse bør kunne lastes opp til Commons som public domain ({{PD-old-70-1923}}, ev. {{PD-Norway50}}). - 4ing (talk) 09:34, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Diana (NSM.2106-745).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gestumblindi (talk) 22:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About files I ulpoad File:Antonio Miguel Pérez (cantante).jpg and File:Antonio Miguel Pérez en Plató.jpg edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Look this link: these pictures are licenced under CC-BY-SA 3.0 : https://www.facebook.com/am.antoniomiguelperez/media_set?set=a.268992916871549.100012825282380&type=3 --Marjotsy (talk) 16:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Then you should tag them with {{LicenseReview}}. - 4ing (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Skranevatnet (Foto av Silver Song).jpg edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Jeg fikk denne meldingen på et bilde jeg har lastet opp: {{all rights reserved on Flickr}} Jeg har fått tillatelse av fotografen til å bruke bildet på Wikipedia, mot at jeg oppgir navnet hans. Har jeg fortsatt ikke gyldig tillatelse til å laste opp bildet? Må jeg ta kontakt med ham igjen og be han om å endre rettighetene på bildet fra "© All rights reserved" til noe annet? Vil helst slippe å plage han noe mer, hvis jeg kan slippe unna med den skriftlige tillatelsen på mail. --Mr Democracy (talk) 21:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mr Democracy: Du må dokumentere at du har fått tillatelse til å laste opp fila med den aktuelle lisensen. Se Commons:OTRS for nærmere informasjon. Dersom tillatelsen er skrevet på norsk, kan du sende den til info-no@wikimedia.org. - mvh 4ing (talk) 22:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@4ing: Ok, takk for informasjonen 😄 Har sendt en mail nå. Jeg fikk tilatelsen på engelsk. Sendte bare screenshot av meldingen jeg sendte og svaret jeg fikk av han. --Mr Democracy (talk) 00:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kvinnelige forfattere edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Hei. Jeg undres: Er det hensiktsmessig å sortere forfattere etter kjønn? Og i så fall: Tenker du å opprette også en kategori for mannlige forfattere? I all vennlighet, --GAD (talk) 19:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Det er nok unorsk å kategorisere slikt, i hvert fall er dette noe vi unngår på nowp. Dette er imidlertid ikke nowp, og jeg ser ingen grunn til å særbehandle norske forfattere. Category:Female writers by country viser at kategoriseringen er utstrakt, dog mer for kvinner enn menn (Category:Male writers by country). Jeg kommer neppe til å opprette noen slike kategorier selv. - mvh 4ing (talk) 20:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Takk for svaret, som nok forekommer meg litt underlig. Å sette i gang en jobb for så å stoppe halvvegs er saktens vanlig i wiki-verden (har gjort det en del ganger sjøl, dessverre), men likevel litt tvilsom praksis. Men om du ikke har tenkt å beære mennene med en kategori, så får jeg vurdere å gjøre det – i alle fall de norske. Ha en fortsatt behagelig kveld med det stort sett strålende wiki-arbeidet du bedriver. Hilsen GAD (talk) 21:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeg ser ikke på dette som "å sette i gang en jobb", men å bidra til å rydde opp i et pågående arbeid. Category:Female writers from Norway inneholdt kun en liten andel av bildene av norske kvinnelige forfattere som finnes på Commons. Det er det nå rettet opp i. - 4ing (talk) 07:44, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ja, etter raptusen min i morges med de mannlige, så fikk jeg mye nytt på overvåkingslista, og da ser jeg jo at du har et arbeid på gang. Jeg hadde tenkt å fortsette med de mannlige når stunder byr seg, blant de som har egne kategorier, men jeg veit ikke om det vil komme i vegen for det du holder på med nå. I så fall venter jeg gjerne til du har gjort ditt. Jeg legger gjerne inn en innsats for likebehandling av menn og kvinner i kategorisystemet. Sisyfoshilsen, GAD (talk) 15:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeg har ingen strukturert plan for hva jeg skal gjøre videre her. Category:Women of Norway by occupation inneholder ni underkategorier, da samme gjør Category:Men of Norway by occupation. Det er imidlertid ikke helt sammenfall mellom underkategoriene, blant annet mangler Category:Sportswomen from Norway motstykket Category:Male sportspeople from Norway. Men det er nok av andre opprydnings- og kategoriseringsoppgaver på Commons, og en oppgave vokser gjerne brutalt når man begynner på den. - 4ing (talk) 07:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Så sant, så sant. Vi får pusle i veg. --GAD (talk) 10:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you! edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello could you delete this image for me, because I carried it improperly: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BennedittoRita1997.jpg Éder Cambuí (talk) 00:52, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File redirect after cropping edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago9 comments2 people in discussion

Hei 4ing. Først en stor takk for opplasting av mange bilder så langt, men mye vil ha mer vet du, ref lista jeg oversendte. Men jeg la merke til en igjenhengende redirect etter cropping som jeg synes er unødvendig og egentlig litt feil siden hovedbildet med fire personer cropped ikke burde vise til en person men egentlig alle fire. Så kunne du slettet din egen opprettelse av denne redirect'en:

File:Pokalmatch på Östermalms IP i Stockholm 1912 (DOK-48956 ) (cropped).png

Håper hjelpen med kategoriseringene har vært greit så langt. Jeg har også fulgt opp med å legge bilder på korresponderende IW-lenker for en del aktuelle artikler, samt opprettet flere commons-kategorier. Ps. Synes kanskje noen av de croppede bildene du har gjort har blitt noe mørkere enn orginalen. Men et bilde er iallefall bedre enn ingen bilde. Så tusen hjertelig takk. Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 22:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeg har merket omdirigeringen for hurtigsletting. Ellers ser jeg at du følger opp kategorisering og annen rydding - jeg konsentrerer meg om opplasting. Når det gjelder de mørke "croppene", skyldes dette at noen av bildene er lastet opp i png-format. Dette er et tapsfritt format, men miniatyrbildene (ikke bare de beskjærte) er av relativt dårlig kvalitet (se Commons:File types). Jeg laster opp png i de tilfellene jpg-filene har lav oppløsning (png-bildene har generalt høyere oppløsning). - mvh 4ing (talk) 11:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jaja, bare lurte på hvorfor men der fikk jeg jo svaret så takk for det. Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anser du deg ferdig med den bilde-lista jeg ga deg per bruker-mail eller ? Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 10:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Migrant: Nei, jeg har bare en pause ;-) - 4ing (talk) 11:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Den er grei, du. Med vennlig 16. mai-hilsen Migrant (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bare ser at dette bilde av de fire S'ene med deres trener, samt daværende konge og kronprins som jeg inkluderte i lista per mail du fikk, er allerede lastet opp på wikimedia.commons. Slik at for å unngå dobbelopplasting så kan du nok stryke den fra lista, eventuelt fikse nåværende fil på wikimedia.commons om du har noe å tillegge på den. Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 23:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Migrant: Dette er et bilde jeg ikke ville ha lastet opp til Commons på grunn av uklar opphavsrettstatus. DigitaltMuseum oppgir fotografen som ukjent og at bildet er public domain. For at dette skal være public domain (egentlig "falt i det fri"), må fotografen ikke være mulig å identifisere og bildet enten være over 50 år gammelt eller over 25 år gammelt ved revisjonen av åndsverkloven i 1996. I tillegg må det være public domain i USA, noe som i praksis vil si at det må ha falt i det fri før 1996. Jeg antar bildet ikke er tatt før 1971. User:Hebue har dessuten utstyrt det med en CC0-lisens, noe som ifølge opplysningene på DigitaltMuseum ikke ser ut til å være berettiget. - 4ing (talk) 07:05, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hvis jeg skal forsøke meg på en mulig datering så vet jeg at landslagstreneren, Johs Tenmann sluttet som landslagtrener våren 1979, og er avbildet mellom Storholt og daværende kronprins Harald, så er det nok før den tid og antagelig i siste halvdel av 1970-åra eller midten av det samme tiåret (Det var jo da fire S'ene var gode). Anledningen kan være i forbindelse med et mesterskap på Bislett eller nyttårsløpene samme sted kanskje. Så at bildet er tatt før 1971 det har jeg også lite tro på de yngste S'ene hadde jo enda ikke blitt titulert med det navnet i 1971. Selv om de selvfølgelig var aktive i 1971, så deltok de samlet første gang i et internasjonalt mesterskap i 1975. Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bilde av Agdenes kirke edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Vi mangler et ordentlig bilde av Agdenes kirke. Lokalhistoriewiki har et Widerøe-bilde fra 1961 som de har hentet fra Nasjonalbiblioteket. Det er publisert som PD med over 50 års alder. Hvilken lisens bruker vi på Commons for slikt? Vinguru (talk) 17:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Samme "lisens" er tilgjengelig her med malen {{PD-Norway50}}. Hvorvidt dette bildet faktisk dekkes av denne lisensen er jeg imidlertid usikker på. Bildet ble tatt i 1961, og kom da under fotografiloven av 1960. Den hadde kun 25 år vernetid (men minst 15 år etter fotografens død). Loven sier også (§3): "Når ikkje anna er opplyst, skal den verta rekna for fotograf som eig det namn eller firma eller ålment kjent merke som er sett på eksemplar av biletet på vanleg måte, eller vert oppgjeve når bilete vert synt fram offentleg." Dersom fotografen er ukjent, ville bildet ha falt i det fri i 1976/77. Her er imidlertid firmaet kjent (Fjellanger Widerøe), og etter loven sitter da eieren med opphavsretten selv om den fysiske personen som har tatt bildet er ukjent. - 4ing (talk) 19:59, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Det er forsåvidt bekymringsverdig, så jeg drøyer det litt, skjønt jeg ser at Lokalhistoriewiki har store mengder Widerøe-bilder lastet opp av erfarne folk.

Nok et spørsmål: Jeg ser at Riksantikvaren på sitt Kulturminnesøk-nettsted har bilder merket som CC-BY, men uten SA e.l. etter. Er det grei skuring? Se for eksempel dette av en ruin som kan ha vært en kirke. Vinguru (talk) 19:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CC-BY er en grei lisens på Commons]]. - 4ing (talk) 19:59, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hjelp: HotCat og bilde-tagging får det ikke til på noen bilder ? edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hei 4ing. På noen av de siste idrettsbildene du lastet opp på commons så får jeg forskjellige muligheter for bruk av Hotcat og bilde-tagging/annotations. Jeg får/fikk det til på bildet av Ordfører Audensen og skøyteløper Halvorsen men ikke på fargebildet av Ivar Formo eller noen av de andre nylige opplastede fargeidrettsbildene fra Dextra Photo hva er grunnen og hvorfor skjer dette. Er det noen avsluttende tagger i en eller annen brukte maler på bildene som er grunnen ? Jeg ser at {{LicenseReview}} ikke er på begge bilder ? Er det det som er grunnen ? Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 20:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Migrant: Det fungerer som normalt for meg, vet ikke om det kan være et cache-problem eller ufullstendig lasting av siden. Prøv igjen! Jeg er for øvrig ferdig med å laste opp de bildene jeg føler meg sikker på kan ligge på Commons. - 4ing (talk) 20:25, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tja, ikke vet jeg, men takk for svar ihvertfall. Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 20:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ugrás az Everestről - Élőben.jpg edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ugrás az Everestről - Élőben.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GRuban (talk) 19:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kvikne (Bjørgan) prestegård edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Jeg har stusset litt over forskjellige bilder her, og er fortsatt litt svimmel etter å ha myset gjennom fotografier og satellittbilder. Jeg lurer imidlertid på om ikke det bildet (med to tilfeller av beskjæringer) som er i denne kategorien, viser Moen snarere enn prestegården i Kvikne. Sistnevnte heter Bjørgan, og der tilbragte Bjørnsom noen barneår mens faren var prest i bygda. Ifølge kartverkene ligger imidlertid Bjørgan litt oppi skråningen øst for riksvei 3, mens Moen er nordvest for kirken over et jorde og et lite tjern. En annen ting som har bidratt til min forvirring, er at bygningene på Moen ser ut til å ha blitt endret, jf. bilder hos Riksantikvaren med en bygning som ligner på prestegårdsbygningen. Se også oppslag om prestegården. Hva tror du? Vinguru (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Vinguru: Jeg har sett Bjørgan omtalt som "tidligere prestegård", kanskje Moen er den nye? - 4ing (talk) 20:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bilder på Bokhylla edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

Jeg stusser litt over regler og muligheter. Jeg ser at vi har bilder fra Nasjonalbibliotekets samling som later til å være lastet opp med en bot, men der man ved å klikke på "Innhold" på Bokhylla får beskjed om at bildet ikke kan kopieres uten tillatelse. Likevel regner jeg med at det som skal sjekkes og klareres, er ordnet. Blant interessante bilder fra Bokhylla som vi ikke har, er dette av Lesjaskog stasjon med et ventende tog. Bildet er tatt av H.C. Neupert (som døde i 1941) og publisert av Mittet (som gikk inn eller ble oppkjøpt på 1980-tallet, og det sies i oppslaget om firmaet at Riksantikvaren har overtatt deler av samlingen, uten at jeg vet hva det betyr for generell status). Så da lurer jeg: Er dette noe vi kan bruke? Vinguru (talk) 11:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tror du bør spørre Profoss om dette, det er han som står bak botopplastninger fra bl.a. Nasjonalbiblioteket. 4ing (talk) 11:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hei, opplastingen fra Nasjonalbiblioteket gjorde jeg da jeg var ansatt på Nasjonalbiblioteket på oppfordring fra ledelsen som var svært opptatt av å spre de bildene vi kunne legge ut (etter opphavsrett etc). Bildet du viser til er digitalisert etter jeg sluttet. Profoss (talk) 12:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Da antar jeg at NB har en viss råderett over disse. Men har de endret policy, eller er det ev. et kapasitetsspørsmål? Kan man henvende seg direkte for å søke om tillatelse? (Det må jo tross alt publiseres med fri lisens.) Vinguru (talk) 12:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Problemet ligger nok i at det var jeg som organiserte hele opplastingen og da jeg sluttet falt arbeidsoppgaven vekk. Jeg ser ikke noe problem hvis du henvender deg om tillatelse. Profoss (talk) 12:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeg har inntrykk av at dette er ei standardmelding som dukker opp støtt. Jeg ser det også på bøker som åpenbart er falt i det fri. Jeg ville sett bort fra meldinga, når det gjelder bilder der det er klart at rettighetene etter opphavspersonen er gått ut. På den andre sida skader det sikkert ikke å spørre ... Hilsen GAD (talk) 06:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Spørsmålet kan i alle fall dukke opp, i og med at man oppgir kilde og lenker tilbake til NB-siden der bildet er publisert. Men dernest blir problemstillingen om det kan kreves at man får NB til å bruke en annen melding (med eksplisitt CC-lisens) på (noen av) sine sider. Det er ikke sikkert det er realistisk. Det dreier seg potensielt om en god del bilder. Vinguru (talk) 08:38, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rosy68 (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Havvindparken Sheringham Shoal.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Havvindparken Sheringham Shoal.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Havvindparken Sheringham Shoal.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Te750iv (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Øystein Bache 2015 (cropped).jpg edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Øystein Bache 2015 (cropped).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Crop of image sourced to a file since deleted as copyvio BevinKacon (talk) 20:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Important message for file movers edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 2000 files per page. After the new edit, the page would have reached 2003 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad or because the galleries need to encompass a shorter timeframe. Please review your settings and request an appropriate change to your gallery. The logs are available here.

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your the bot owner will remove the gallery altogether.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre, via OgreBot (talk) 03:25, 3 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Listed_structures edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Listed structures has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 08:22, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Removingː FileːMemory shield of Kristian Øvrevollseie in Hovet edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hello 4ing, It has been a time ago that I edited something in Wikipedia, forgot too much, but here to try to contact you because you removed the file about Kristian Øvrevollseie. To avoid to be blocked I need to know what specifically I cannot upload in Wikimedia Commons about Norway. I live in Norway, and the only pictures I make are made in Norway. I have a lot to be shared. Reason to avoid to be blocked. Is art photographed by myself in a museum also forbidden? --DutchColours (talk) 11:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@DutchColours: I think you will find useful information on Commons:Freedom of panorama. Generally, artists must have died more than 70 years ago for their works to be in the public domain. - 4ing (talk) 12:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

4ing Thank you for the link. Howeverː Not one of my photos uploaded in Wikimedia Commons has ever been in the public domain. They are all licensed with Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, a license that I could chose in a list of possibilities, created by Wikimedia Commons. You write about the Øvrevollseie fileː "Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose." Againː this has never been the case since I uploaded my latest photo there. So, I am very surprised to meet this problem in october 2020, and found today, because of personal circumstances not able to answer earlier. thanks for answering, in advance. --DutchColours (talk) 14:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@DutchColours: You can't upload photographs of copyrighted art, e.g. a sculpture by an artist which is alive or died in 1951 or later (70 years ago). - 4ing (talk) 21:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@4ing: Now I understand. Thanksǃ --DutchColours (talk) 09:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bilder fra Eiker edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bildene fra Eiker har jeg fått på CD fra Eiker Historielag som har samlet dem inn, Bent Ek. Bingar1234 Bingar1234 (talk) 23:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bingar1234: Takk for info. Eiker Historielag har vel neppe opphavsretten til noen av disse bildene. For at bildene skal kunne beholdes på Wikimedia Commons, må det opplyses om opphavsperson på hvert av bildene for å kunne vurdere om bildene fremdeles er underlagt opphavsrett eller om den har utløpt (public domain). De bildene som eventuelt fremdeles er underlagt opphavsrett, kan kun beholdes dersom den som sitter på opphavsretten har publisert dem med en fri lisens eller gir tillatelse til det (se Commons:OTRS). Mer om lisensiering, opphavsrett og "public domain" kan du lese om på COM:L, COM:PD og Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Norway. - 4ing (talk) 08:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Foto til Ross Kolby-artikkel. edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hei, no:User:4ing, og takk for at du har sett på fotografier jeg har lastet opp. Jeg skjønner at jeg skulle ha lagt inn mer informasjon på enkelte av opplastingene. På https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kolby_som_Cedric_i_novellefilmen_%22VINDICTA%22_av_regiss%C3%B8r_Lasse_Pedersen..jpg#file har jeg nå sjekket og det viser seg at det var regissør Lasse Pedersen selv som tok bildet, og ikke Mikkel Ilnes. Jeg har fra før fått lov av Pedersen til å frigi bildet her på Wikimedia, men jeg skal nå be ham om å sende en slik e-post som verifiserer at jeg har lov til å laste det opp. Funker dette da, tror du? --Constituto (talk) 16:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Constituto: Flott hvis du kan få tillatelser i orden. Det er ikke tilstrekkelig å skrive at du har fått tillatelse i bildeinfoen, denne typen bilder krever skriftlig tillatelse for å kunne beholdes. Du finner mer info på Commons:OTRS om format, krav og mottaker av tillatelse. - mvh 4ing (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@4ing Ja, skjønner :) Jeg tror han sender e-posten i dag, så håper jeg systemet behandler den raskt. Jeg vil også at alt skal være i orden. Takk for hjelpen! --Constituto (talk) 18:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:IMO 7214856 edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

As far as I can see you placed the image here. Unfortunately it is not the right ship. It is the Rhine Forest (ship, 1972), IMO 7125706, look at the image.--Stunteltje (talk) 12:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Stunteltje: I suppose you refer to the image in the infobox? The infobox was added to the IMO category by User:Pi bot in 2018. The infobox gets the image from Wikidata, where the image was added to the element «MS München» (Q176204) by User:VIGNERON in 2016. If the image is not depicting MS München, it has to be corrected at Wikidata. - 4ing (talk) 14:29, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I got pinged since I operate Pi bot. It looks like this came from fr:München (navire, 1972), where the image is used even though it's not the same ship. I've swapped the image on Wikidata for one of the model. It might take a while to show up here due to caching. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

L.S. It works in my browser already. Thanks to you both. (I am not familiar with Wikidata, too difficult for a simple user.)--Stunteltje (talk) 15:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm late but thanks for noticing the error, I corrected it on the article fr:München (navire, 1972) on the French Wikipédia as well. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:BUSEN 8.JPG edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:BUSEN 8.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:BUSEN 8.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 2000 files per page.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad or because the galleries need to encompass a shorter timeframe. Please review your settings and request an appropriate change to your gallery. The logs are available here.

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your the bot owner will remove the gallery altogether.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre, via OgreBot (talk) 01:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 2000 files per page.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad or because the galleries need to encompass a shorter timeframe. Please review your settings and request an appropriate change to your gallery. The logs are available here.

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your the bot owner will remove the gallery altogether.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre, via OgreBot (talk) 01:51, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 2000 files per page.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad or because the galleries need to encompass a shorter timeframe. Please review your settings and request an appropriate change to your gallery. The logs are available here.

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your the bot owner will remove the gallery altogether.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre, via OgreBot (talk) 02:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 2000 files per page.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad or because the galleries need to encompass a shorter timeframe. Please review your settings and request an appropriate change to your gallery. The logs are available here.

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your the bot owner will remove the gallery altogether.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre, via OgreBot (talk) 02:27, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 2000 files per page.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad or because the galleries need to encompass a shorter timeframe. Please review your settings and request an appropriate change to your gallery. The logs are available here.

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your the bot owner will remove the gallery altogether.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre, via OgreBot (talk) 03:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 24443 files (including files already on the page).

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 24658 files (including files already on the page).

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 22152 files (including files already on the page).

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:23, 4 May 2022 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 22011 files (including files already on the page).

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:4ing/Antarctica edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:4ing/Antarctica, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 25519 files (including files already on the page).

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 i Norge edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there! I see that you have participated in the Norwegian part of Wiki Loves Monuments in previous years. Thank you very much! I'd like to inform you that the 2022 edition of the contest has just started, and I want to encourage you to participate this year as well!

Photos are not required to have been taken this year – they can be from any time, as long as they are uploaded during October 2022. Maybe you have some more pictures from previous years that can be uploaded for this year's contest?

You can read more about it on the contest page. Thanks, and good luck! Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (talk) 17:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Photographs_by_Bert_Knottenbeld edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Photographs by Bert Knottenbeld has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Geo Swan (talk) 01:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Løsninger edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Er File:S1-H2022-LK20-LF.pdf lovligt at uploade? Hjart (talk) 12:29, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Så lenge det er eget verk, tror jeg det. Men kanskje det er "Out of scope" for Commons? - 4ing (talk) 15:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hahahaha.jpg edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Hahahaha.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect))

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Meno25.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Empire_of_Westantarctica edit

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Empire_of_Westantarctica has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Clarinetguy097 (talk) 16:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sirdal komm.png edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Sirdal komm.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Worldlydev (talk) 15:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Add topic